Comparisons

Comparing a T600 impulse with a free version of the same program

By Peter E. Roos

I have been asked several times if there are actually differences between my impulse files and corresponding files that can be found in free but smaller downloadable archives, in particular from www.noisevault.com.

During the recording sessions for the T600 library, I also recorded mono white noise bursts through all the presets for calibration purposes, along with several other source sounds and timing signals. I wanted to have these "all wet" noise recordings to help me compare the frequency spectrums of the original device's programs and my final IRs. From the literature I already knew that I was going to need some serious corrective EQ to handle deconvolution side-effects.

Sources

You can download the T600 Church program used in this comparison (the mono-to-stereo, "C" version was used).
You can find the free Church IR used here on this external page (TC6000 Presets File A) on the excellent NoiseVault forum.

Illustrations


Click on the images to enlarge them.

Frequency spectrums of noise, through the original device and the IRs


Input signal spectrum: white noise, dry
(top: L, bottom: R)
 
Church program of original digital reverb
(top: L, bottom: R), full wet output
 
FREE Church program IR
(top: L, bottom: R)
This graph clearly displays a very differently sounding ambience: a bump in the lower mids, a big dip in the higher mids, and finally a lift in the highest frequencies. It should be clear that this IR has very "personal" sound, compored to the original device's preset.
 
T600 Church program IR (top: L, bottom: R)
This graph shows that the Samplicity IR has a very similar spectrum compared with the original device preset, in the graph right above this one.
In the upper range, the Samplicity IR seems to be slightly brighter, but this may also be caused to the plugin used.
The drop below 30 Hz is the result of a very steep low cut to remove deconvolution side-effects, which introduced a lot of subsonic energy in the IR's. After removing them, the signal-to-noise ratio's very significantly improved.

Frequency spectrums of the IRs (0.0 - 4.0 sec, most important sonic part in this IR)

The following spectrums are made from the IRs themselves.
Note: these graphs run from 0 Hz instead of 20 Hz!

FREE IR (top: L, bottom: R)
 
T600 IR (top: L, bottom: R)

Tails of the IR's, frequency spectrum
(4.0 - 5.85 sec, the part that resolves into background noise)


FREE IR
Notice the presence of a strong 36 Hz component and quite some high frequency noise
 
T600 IR
Only the corresponding part of the tail is used, as our IR is much longer than the free IR
Notice that the tail nicely reduces to the mid range, what is to be expected in real spaces

Start of the IR wave forms, zoomed in on the first reflections


Noise in the free IR (bottom) and in the Samplicity verion (top)
 
Noise in the free IR (top) and in the Samplicity verion (bottom)
(sorry for the reversal in the display)

Truncated offset and fade-out problems


Predelay, or offset removed from free IR
Top: the start of the Samplicity IR
Bottom: Free IR, which starts much earlier than the original device's preset. Thus: the original first reflection predelay has been removed in the Free IR
 
Fade-out problems in free IR - the same zoom factors are used for both IRs